Smoking- An Awesome Remedy - No, Really! I'm Serious!
#1
Posted 11 December 2010 - 02:38 PM
How smoking changed my life.
I was diagnosed with narcolepsy at Standford Sleep Center at the age of 11 (17 years ago). I gone through every medication imaginable.
My experiences:
1. Ritalin (noticed that I could stay awake much better but wasn't as strong as one would like)
2. Modafinil (this drug was only good for limiting the effects of strong stimulants and keeping you slightly more awake, problems are that cataplexy is very apparent on this drug)
3. No drugs - (um ya, this doesn't work unless you like sleeping, have no life, and don't have to worry about making any money.... nuff said)
4. Dexedrine (this drug is by far the best for limiting the effects of all narcolepsy symptoms - however, you may notice personality changes as well as other stimulant related side-effects)
Before college, and during college it became apparent to me that my dosage of dexedrine might be higher than I needed. Don't get me wrong, the drug was wonderful for it's regulation of narcolepsy (and still is), but the side-effects of paranoia and agitation(or what I percieved as agitation) were too much. It was eating into my personal life. So I decided to drop from 30mg of dexedrine/day to 10mg. Even though I started taking more naps, I didn't mind because others noticed that I was more mellow and perhaps easier to get along with.
One day, I took up smoking because I had started smoking little by little through a mutual friend.
I didn't notice that the smoking had any effect until discovered that I could completely stop taking the dexedrine and be a able to get through my day just fine.
The most startling thing is that the cataplexy is completely absent. I have had maybe two instances of cataplexy in the last 4 years. I still take regular naps and 5mg of dexdrine to jumpstart my day, but for the most part I feel completely normal. (cigarette - one/hr.)
It's so great.
Although nicotine is a stimulant, there is also strong evidence for it's action as an immunosuppressant. My hypothesis, is that it could act by keeping in check HLA related antibodies that are produced.
Just a thought.
Tim
#2
Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:41 PM
When people find a med and it actually WORKS, I'm all for it. And nicotine's no less a med than anything else we all take. But I'm kinda worried about your lungs (not that you should care what I'm worried about). Have you thought about other methods of nicotine delivery? PWN are at extraordinarily high risk of overweight, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and Type II diabetes (all of which, by the way, we can all do significant things to prevent), and adding Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease to the list is not going to do much to improve your quality life twenty to thirty years from now.
#3
Posted 29 December 2010 - 10:47 AM
Here is my story and I leave this topic open to comments:
How smoking changed my life.
I was diagnosed with narcolepsy at Standford Sleep Center at the age of 11 (17 years ago). I gone through every medication imaginable.
My experiences:
1. Ritalin (noticed that I could stay awake much better but wasn't as strong as one would like)
2. Modafinil (this drug was only good for limiting the effects of strong stimulants and keeping you slightly more awake, problems are that cataplexy is very apparent on this drug)
3. No drugs - (um ya, this doesn't work unless you like sleeping, have no life, and don't have to worry about making any money.... nuff said)
4. Dexedrine (this drug is by far the best for limiting the effects of all narcolepsy symptoms - however, you may notice personality changes as well as other stimulant related side-effects)
Before college, and during college it became apparent to me that my dosage of dexedrine might be higher than I needed. Don't get me wrong, the drug was wonderful for it's regulation of narcolepsy (and still is), but the side-effects of paranoia and agitation(or what I percieved as agitation) were too much. It was eating into my personal life. So I decided to drop from 30mg of dexedrine/day to 10mg. Even though I started taking more naps, I didn't mind because others noticed that I was more mellow and perhaps easier to get along with.
One day, I took up smoking because I had started smoking little by little through a mutual friend.
I didn't notice that the smoking had any effect until discovered that I could completely stop taking the dexedrine and be a able to get through my day just fine.
The most startling thing is that the cataplexy is completely absent. I have had maybe two instances of cataplexy in the last 4 years. I still take regular naps and 5mg of dexdrine to jumpstart my day, but for the most part I feel completely normal. (cigarette - one/hr.)
It's so great.
Although nicotine is a stimulant, there is also strong evidence for it's action as an immunosuppressant. My hypothesis, is that it could act by keeping in check HLA related antibodies that are produced.
Just a thought.
Tim
Tim,
I haven't smoked a cigarette since October, 2004 after smoking for about 14 years and trying to quit at least a dozen times. I wasn't diagnosed with narcolepsy until April, 2008 but looking back I can see that my symptoms became more evident after I stopped smoking. At the time I wrote it off as withdrawal or depression. I just started drinking more coffee. Nicotine and whatever else is in cigarettes seems to have suppressed some of my symptoms. That being said, there is no way I am going to start smoking again.
Have you experimented with nicotine replacement products instead of the cigarettes? I would think that would be the lesser of two evils.
Gary
#4
Posted 29 December 2010 - 01:11 PM
#5
Posted 17 January 2011 - 09:22 PM
It was all I could do to stay awake. Cigarettes in NYC cost $12/pack. That over $40/day out-of-pocket and it's only going to get worse.
Plus, you can't go out because they don't allow smoking. I couldn't go to cafe's or bars anymore. And, without cigarettes I couldn't socialize.
Now that I'm on Xyrem, the cigarettes taste awful, I don't have the cravings and I don't feel the effects.
I've cut down but have been unable to completely quit.
I went to city hall to try to stop some of the new anti-smoking laws they are passing. You will be a prisoner in your own home if you rely on this as treatment. I have been for years in NYC.
But, even with all of the substances, I was always extremely sleepy. These substances for me barely worked, but they were all I had.
#6
Posted 21 January 2011 - 06:07 PM
I have given up every other recreational drug I have ever done, (and there were plenty!) with a drop of a hat. No rehab, no meetings, just got bored and quit doing them. Cigarettes though..... I cant seem to kick them. Its terrible. I will quit for little bits at a time and then something will set me off, and I am at it again.
I do agree they help with waking up, and staying that way, and help me keep more focused and calm. If I am feeling tired I can go smoke and get another half hour to my day. I agree with Sariah though. I am worried about my lungs. It is to the point after so many years, I can feel the damage is starting to happen. While I am in quit mode I physically feel so much better!
Some how I dont see docs prescribing nicotine patches for narcolepsy any time soon though. Right now its cheaper to just smoke. =(
Great subject!
#7
Posted 06 March 2011 - 06:08 PM
#8
Posted 08 April 2011 - 04:38 PM
LYnette
#9
Posted 20 August 2011 - 03:25 PM
In 2009, after almost 25 years of addiction, I decided that nothing was more important than quitting smoking... watching my Dad deteriorate due to emphysema certainly catalyzed that decision. I am proud to say that 2010 was my first full year without a cigarette since 1986.
At the same time I tried more intense drug therapy for Narcolepsy adding Provigil and Xyrem (and for a short time an anti-depressant) to my established regiment of 15mg/day Adderall XR. Had I not had insurance, my drug bill would have been around $5000/ month. I have found that scheduled, regular naps; reducing my intake of caffeine and alcohol; and religious adherence to my nighttime sleep schedule have been even more effective treatments for my Narcolepsy than cigarettes. I am off the Provigil and Xyrem, and I am currently in the process of weening myself off of the Adderall XR (down to 7.5mg/day, now) as I have moved to a country where Adderall is not available, and I will report back soon.
I will not be returning to cigarettes in any case. The downside is too significant.
Good luck to all in finding a treatment compatible your lifestyle.... and a lifestyle that is compatible with your condition.
From Wikipedia:
The neuropeptide, hypocretin-1 (Orexin A), may initiate a key signaling cascade, a series of closely linked biochemical reactions, which maintains tobacco addiction in human smokers and could be a potential target for developing new smoking cessation treatments.
"Blocking hypocretin-1 receptors not only decreased the motivation to continue nicotine use in rats, it also abolished the stimulatory effects of nicotine on their brain reward circuitries," said Paul Kenny, Ph.D., the Scripps Research scientist at Scripps Florida who led the study.*
The discovery that an orexin/hypocretin receptor mutation causes the sleep disorder canine narcolepsy[6] in Doberman Pinschers subsequently indicated a major role for this system in sleep regulation. Genetic knockout mice lacking the gene for orexin were also reported to exhibit narcolepsy.[7] Transitioning frequently and rapidly between sleep and wakefulness, these mice display many of the symptoms of narcolepsy. Researchers are using this animal model of narcolepsy to study the disease.[8] Narcolepsy results in excessive daytime sleepiness, inability to consolidate wakefulness in the day (and sleep at night), and cataplexy, which is the loss of muscle tone in response to strong, usually positive, emotions. Dogs that lack a functional receptor for orexin/hypocretin have narcolepsy, while animals and people lacking the orexin/hypocretin neuropeptide itself also have narcolepsy.
#10
Posted 20 August 2011 - 09:20 PM
I've never smoked, and don't plan to, and wouldn't encourage anyone to either since the health, social and monetary costs are just too great for everyone though.
#11
Posted 11 September 2011 - 01:01 PM










